Treatment Options for Triple-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
Release Date: July 30, 2008
Expiration Date: July 30, 2009
Approximately 15% of breast cancers are estrogen receptor–negative (ER–)/progesterone receptor–negative (PgR–)/HER2– (“triple-negative”) breast cancers. Triple-negative status is associated with increased aggressiveness and decreased recurrence-free survival. Since these tumors are not sensitive to hormonal or HER2-targeted therapy, therapeutic options for these patients have primarily consisted of systemic chemotherapy, while searches for novel targets continue. Although some chemotherapeutic regimens have demonstrated activity in patients with triple-negative breast cancer, there is no current standard of care for those patients. The aggressiveness of this tumor subtype requires that physicians stay informed of the efficacy and safety of therapeutic options for metastatic disease, both in the first-line setting and beyond, including antiangiogenic therapy and novel microtubule-targeted agents.
The purpose of this activity is to update physicians on the utility of new treatment options for triple-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), including antiangiogenic therapy and novel microtubule-targeted agents.
This educational activity is intended for medical oncologists involved in the care of patients with breast cancer. No specific skills or knowledge other than a basic training in oncology is required for successful participation in this activity.
Upon completion of this educational activity, you should be able to:
Successful completion is determined by a score of 67% or greater.
Read all of the conditions in the Activity Terms box below. You must accept the Activity Terms in order to continue:
It is the policy of Physicians’ Education Resource to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all of its educational activities. As an organization accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), Physicians’ Education Resource requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an educational activity, including spouses/partners, to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines “relevant financial relationships” as financial relationships in any amount occurring within the past 12 months that create a conflict of interest. Physicians’ Education Resource has implemented a mechanism to identify and resolve all conflicts of interest prior to the activity.
Hope S. Rugo, MD
Research funding – Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Genentech, Inc.; GlaxoSmithKline; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Roche Pharmaceuticals
Speaker’s Bureau – AstraZeneca; Genomic Health, Inc.
PER Editorial Staff
No relevant relationships to disclose
This CME activity might include discussion of investigational and/or unlabeled uses of drugs. If the activity includes discussion of investigational and/or unlabeled uses of a drug, specific information is located on the title page. Please refer to the full prescribing information for each drug discussed in this newsletter for FDA-approved dosing, indications, and warnings.
The Web pages and Web-based applications require a minimum Web browser of Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher, Mozilla Firefox 1.0 or higher, or another compatible Web browser.
If you are not sure of the version of your browser, select Help in the menu bar of your browser, then select About.
PC Users
If you need to upgrade your Web browser, follow one of the links listed below:
Macintosh Users
Compatible Web browsers include Firefox (Outside Source) and Apple Safari (Outside Source).
Illustrator: Erin Moore
The views and opinions expressed in this activity are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor, supporter, or publisher. Although great care has been taken in compiling and checking the information given in this activity to ensure accuracy, the authors and Physicians’ Education Resource and its servants or agents shall not be responsible or in any way liable for the continued currency of the information or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this publication, whether arising from negligence or otherwise howsoever or for any consequences arising therefrom.
Please consult full prescribing information for any drugs or procedures discussed within.
Physicians’ Education Resource (PER) makes reasonable efforts to ensure that privacy issues are handled responsibly. PER does not sell or share your information with other organizations that are not directly involved in this process. If you have further concerns, you may contact us at (888) 949-0045.
All rights reserved. No part of this activity may be translated, reproduced, stored, or transmitted by any means or in any type of media form including electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording, broadcasting, or otherwise without prior permission from the publisher.
©Copyright 2008 by Physicians’ Education Resource. No material may be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form, without prior permission from the publisher.
All correspondence should be directed to:
Editor, Interactive Case Study: Treatment Options for Triple-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
Physicians’ Education Resource
3500 Maple Ave.
Suite 700
Dallas, TX 75219
Phone: (214) 367-3456
Fax: (214) 367-3304
E-mail: editor@pergrouplp.com
An educational grant for this activity was provided by:
Hope S. Rugo, MD
Clinical Professor of Medicine
Director, Breast Oncology Clinical Trials Program
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, CA