Case Studies in Oncology Vol. 9, No. 1
Release Date: September 24, 2008
Expiration Date: September 24, 2009
Andrew H. Ko, MD
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with 37,680 new cases expected in 2008, nearly 90% of which will succumb to advanced disease within 1 year. Of these patients, 34,290 are projected to die in 2008, representing 91% of those diagnosed. Surgical resection of disease is the only cure for pancreatic cancer, but only 20% of the patients with newly diagnosed disease are candidates for surgery. Standard first-line systemic therapy for advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer is treatment with a deoxycytidine antimetabolite, which is associated with a 1-year survival rate of only < 20%. Options for second-line therapy have been limited in a patient population plagued by poor performance and functional status. Examining emerging data from clinical trials of salvage therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer is critical in helping physicians devise treatment strategies when an important therapeutic option is enrollment in clinical trials. Ongoing clinical trials continued to address the lack of therapeutic standards for this patient population.
The purpose of this activity is to discuss therapeutic options for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have previously been treated with a deoxycytidine antimetabolite.
This activity is intended for medical oncologists involved in the care of patients with pancreatic cancer. No specific skills or knowledge other than a basic training in oncology is required for successful participation in this activity.
Upon completion of this educational activity, you should be able to:
Read all of the conditions in the Activity Terms box below. You must accept the Activity Terms in order to continue:
Disclosure Policy
It is the policy of Physicians’ Education Resource to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all of its educational activities. As an organization accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), Physicians’ Education Resource requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an educational activity, including spouses/partners, to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines “relevant financial relationships” as financial relationships in any amount occurring within the past 12 months that create a conflict of interest. Physicians’ Education Resource has implemented a mechanism to identify and resolve all conflicts of interest prior to the activity.
Andrew H. Ko, MD
Research Funding – Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech, Inc., sanofi-aventis U.S.
Speaker’s Bureau – Roche Pharmaceuticals
PER Editorial Staff
Erin Grothey, MS (spouse)
Research Funding – sanofi-aventis U.S.
Paid Consultant – Amgen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Genentech, Inc., Roche Pharmaceuticals, sanofi-aventis U.S.
Other PER Staff
No relevant relationships to disclose
This CME activity might include discussion of investigational and/or unlabeled uses of drugs. If the activity includes discussion of investigational and/or unlabeled uses of a drug, specific information is located on the title page. Please refer to the full prescribing information for each drug discussed in this newsletter for FDA–approved dosing, indications, and warnings.
Commercial Support
An educational grant for this activity was provided by Genentech BioOncology.
Software Requirements
The Web pages and Web–based applications require a minimum Web browser of Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher, Mozilla Firefox 1.0 or higher, or another compatible Web browser.
If you are not sure of the version of your browser, select Help in the menu bar of your browser, then select About.
PC UsersMacintosh Users
Compatible Web browsers include Firefox (Outside Source) and Apple Safari (Outside Source)
Illustration
Computed tomography scans of a patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer revealing a pancreatic head mass with associated pancreatic ductal dilatation (A) and multiple subcentimeter pulmonary nodules at baseline (B)
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this activity are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor, supporter, or publisher. Although great care has been taken in compiling and checking the information given in this activity to ensure accuracy, the authors, and Physicians’ Education Resource and its servants or agents shall not be responsible or in any way liable for the continued currency of the information or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this activity, whether arising from negligence or otherwise howsoever or for any consequences arising therefrom.
Please consult full prescribing information for any drugs or procedures discussed within.
Privacy Policy
Physicians’ Education Resource (PER) makes reasonable efforts to ensure that privacy issues are handled responsibly. PER does not sell or share your information with other organizations that are not directly involved in this process. If you have further concerns, you may contact us at (888) 949–0045.
All rights reserved. No part of this activity may be translated, reproduced, stored, or transmitted by any means or in any type of media form including electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording, broadcasting, or otherwise without prior permission from the publisher.
©Copyright 2008 by Physicians’ Education Resource. No material may be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form, without written permission from the publisher.
All correspondence should be directed to:
Editor, Case Studies in Oncology
Physicians’ Education Resource
3500 Maple Ave.
Suite 700
Dallas, TX 75219
Phone: (214) 367–3456
Fax: (214) 367–3304
E–mail: editor@pergrouplp.com
Download a Print Version of this Publication*
*Print format is for reference only
An educational grant for this activity was provided by: